Home

Parish
Organizations

Sacraments

School

Weekly
Bulletin

Music

Youth
Ministry

Home
Ministry

Stanford
Hospital

Human
Concerns

Gardens

| HCC HOME | CALENDAR | MEETING MINUTES |

 

A Call to Faithful Citizenship

U.S. Bishops have spoken clearly on the Catholic responsibility to engage in the political process. A statement was offered by the United States Council of Catholic Bishops (USCCB) prior to the general election of 2004. Here is an excerpt of that statement (http://www.usccb.org/ faithfulcitizenship/bishopStatement.html):
One of our greatest blessings in the United States is our right and responsibility to participate in civic life. Everyone can and should participate. Even those who cannot vote have the right to have their voices heard on issues that affect their communities.
The Constitution protects the right of individuals and of religious bodies to speak out without governmental interference, favoritism, or discrimination. Major public issues have moral dimensions. Religious values have significant public consequences. Our nation is enriched and our tradition of pluralism is enhanced, not threatened, when religious groups contribute their values to public debates.
A recent Vatican statement on Catholic participation in political life highlights the need for involvement:
Today's democratic societies . . . call for new and fuller forms of participation in public life by Christian and non-Christian citizens alike. Indeed, all can contribute, by voting in elections for lawmakers and government officials, and in other ways as well, to the development of political solutions and legislative choices which, in their opinion, will benefit the common good. In the Catholic tradition, responsible citizenship is a virtue; participation in the political process is a moral obligation. All believers are called to faithful citizenship, to become informed, active, and responsible participants in the political process. As we have said, "We encourage all citizens, particularly Catholics, to embrace their citizenship not merely as a duty and privilege, but as an opportunity meaningfully to participate [more fully] in building the culture of life. Every voice matters in the public forum. Every vote counts. Every act of responsible citizenship is an exercise of significant individual power." Even those who are not citizens are called to participate in the debates which shape our common life.
This page is a multipart conversation on the Church's teaching on issues of the day. What you will read in these reports is not the whole story. Our committee believes that consideration of these reports may result in a broader and deeper understanding of the moral issues which led the U.S. Bishops to write "Faithful Citizenship". [For the doctrinal aspects relating to these topics we rely primarily on "Catechism of the Catholic Church" [CCC], U. S. Catholic Conference, 1994. We will sometimes supplement this with conciliar, pontifical and episcopal writings. The great majority of legislative and "political" information and observations will come from newspaper reports and magazine articles. The content, therefore, (a caveat) is not based on extensive, intensive, or scholarly research.]
• Political Responsibility
• Catholic Social Teaching Principles Podcasts
• Recent Immigration Raids
• Status on Immigration Reform
• Status on Immigration Reform - Update
• Cardinal Mahony Addresses Immigration Issues
• Teaching on Conscience
• The Environment


A Call to Political Responsibilty
This is the title of a reflection offered by the U.S. Bishops. The bishops write of Catholic responsibility to engage in the political process. They set out principles for our guidance and encourage us to act on our moral convictions. Nonetheless, the bishops acknowledge that people may have differing ideas about how to apply them. "People of good will and sound faith can disagree about specific applications of Catholic principles."
These times are particularly crucial because our nation has been attacked and gone to war in Afghanistan and Iraq and because we have passed from budget surpluses to allocating the burdens of deficits. "Politics in this election year and beyond should be about an old idea with new power - the common good. The central question should not be 'Are you better off than you were four years ago?' It should be, 'How can we - all of us especially the weak and vulnerable - be better off in the years ahead?' " And very bluntly, "As Catholics we are not free to abandon unborn children because they are seen as unwanted or inconvenient, to turn our backs on immigrants because they lack the proper documents; to create and then destroy human lives in a quest for medical advances or profits; or to ignore sick people because they have no insurance. Nor can we neglect international responsibilities in the aftermath of war because resources are scarce. Catholic teaching requires to speak up for the voiceless and to act in accord with universal moral values."
Here are some of the major issues the bishops write about:
  • Respect for Life

"Each person's life and dignity must be respected, whether that person is an innocent unborn child in a mother's womb, whether that person worked in the World Trade Center, or a market in Baghdad, or even whether that person is a convicted criminal on death row."
  • Marriage

"The God-given institutions of marriage - a lifelong commitment between a man and a woman - and family are central and serve as the foundations for social life. Marriage and family should be supported and strengthened, not undermined."
  • Workers' Rights

"If the dignity of work is to be protected, then the basic rights of workers, owners, and others must be respected - the right to productive work, to decent and fair wages, to organize and choose a union, to economic initiative, and to ownership and private property."
  • The Environment

"We show our respect for the Creator by our care for creation."
  • War

"Nations must protect the right to life by finding ever more effective ways to prevent conflicts from arising, to resolve them by peaceful means and to promote post-conflict resolutions... We have raised serious moral concerns and questions about preemptive or preventive use of force."
  • Labor

"Because financial and economic factors have such an impact on the well-being and stability of families it is important that just wages be paid to those who work to support their families and that generous efforts be made to aid families."
  • Education

"No one model or means of education is appropriate to the needs of all persons. Parents - the first and most important educators - have a fundamental right to choose the education best suited to the needs of their children, including private and religious schools."
  • Communications

"We support regulation that limits the concentration of control over these media, and disallows sales of media outlets that attract irresponsible owners primarily seeking a profit and [instead] opens these outlets to a greater variety of program sources, including religious programming."
  • Poverty

"The measure of welfare reform should be reducing poverty and dependency, not cutting resources and programs."
  • Health Care

"With tens of millions of Americans lacking basic health insurance, we support measures to ensure that decent health care is available to all as a moral imperative."
  • Agriculture

"Those who grow our food should be able to make a decent living and maintain their way of life . . .[and] our priority concern for the poor calls us to advocate especially for the needs of farm workers, whose pay is generally inadequate, whose housing and working conditions are often deplorable, and who are particularly vulnerable to exploitation"
  • Immigration

"The United States should adopt a more generous immigration and refugee policy."
These are issues that concern our bishops. They ask us to learn more about them, to develop our opinions and then to engage ourselves in the political process, hoping that with our influence the COMMON GOOD will become a paramount issue.

Catholic Social Teaching Principles Podcasts

This article is taken from: http://www.faithfulcitizenship.org/resources/podcasts.

The Catholic Church’s social teaching is a rich treasure of wisdom about building a just society and living lives of holiness amidst the challenges of modern society. Modern Catholic social teaching has been articulated through a tradition of papal, conciliar, and episcopal documents, and the depth and richness of this tradition can be understood best through a direct reading of these documents.

In our “CST Principles Podcasts,” Paulist Father Larry Rice reflects briefly on the major themes of Catholic Social teaching and how they should shape our lives as citizens of the world and as people of God.

Father Larry Rice is the Director of the St. Thomas More Newman Center, the center for Catholic Campus Ministry at Ohio State University in Columbus, OH. His work at the OSU Newman Center includes responsibility for the overall mission and vision of the Center’s staff of 16 and the campus’ Catholic community, and maintaining a professional focus on ecumenical and interfaith dialogue. Since 2000, Fr. Rice has been a weekly contributor to Catholic Radio Weekly (link to www.catholicradioweekly.com), the flagship radio program of the United States Conference of Catholic Bishops. Fr. Rice earned a Masters of Divinity from the Catholic University of America (1989), and a B.A. in General Arts and Sciences from the Pennsylvania State University (1983). He entered the Missionary Society of St. Paul the Apostle (the Paulist Fathers) in 1983, and was ordained a priest in 1989.

For recordings of the following talks, go to: http://www.faithfulcitizenship.org/resources/podcasts:

1. Option for the Poor

2. Peace and Disarmament

3. Political Participation

4. Role of Government

5. Social Justice 1

6. Stewardship of Creation

7. Common Good 1

8. Dignity of the Human Person

9. Economic Justice

10. Global Solidarity

11. Individuals Rights 1  


Recent Immigration Raids

You'll recall reading of a series of coordinated raids on meat packing plants in four states on December 12, 2006. There were a number of arrests, dislocations and deportations. Some local bishops commented.

Archbishop Chaput of Denver reminded officials that there is need for immediate comprehensive immigration reform. Raids, he said, "don't strike at the roots of the real issue: an immigration system that seems disconnected from the human and business realities of the American economy". He expressed concern and compassion for the families disrupted by the arrests.

In this same vein, Bishop Tafoya of Pueblo put a human face on the raids "Family and friends are terrified at the sudden loss of a loved one and are in fear of who is next. Children discovered they had no parent to meet them after school, . . . a mother learned that her husband and father of their kids is gone; she has no money to pay the bills and does not know when she and the kids will see him again."

(Both bishops acknowledged the need for enforcement, but as just one part of the package.)

Bishop Barnes of San Bernardino, writing for the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops: "Enforcement raids do not address the root causes of undocumented migration and are evidence of an incongruent national immigration system. While our country needs immigration workers to fill crucial jobs in important industries, we do not grant them the protection of our laws so they can work without fear."

For more information:

The USCCB website is www.justiceforimmigrants.org

The diocesan website is www.journeyforimmigrants.org

Walt Lundin, Parish Human Concerns Committee, January 2007

Status on Immigration Reform

There seems now to be agreement among most political pundits that comprehensive (i.e., 1. Border enforcement, 2. Employer penalties, 3. Temporary guest worker program, 4. Process toward legality for those who are now illegal) immigration reform is dead for this year and probably the next. The national effort having stalled, some states and smaller jurisdictions are expected to enact laws that mirror some features of the failed national bill.

Most notably, the Democratic governor of Arizona, signed a bill making employers verify the legal status of each new employee. First offense: suspension of business license; second offense: permanent revocation. Gov. Napolitano said she signed the measure with the knowledge that it went too far, that its enforcement was severely underfunded, and that there were no safeguards against racial discrimination. (She has called for a special legislative session this fall to amend these flaws before enforcement begins Jan. 1, 2008.) Concurrently, she has challenged Democratic leaders Pelosi and Reid to renew their efforts for a national solution.

Business interests are trying to advance separate measures for more and employer-based H1B visas (high-tech employers) and a greatly-expanded temporary worker program for agricultural workers.

Some cities are arranging to deputize their police force so that local police can act as agents of the Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) Agency. Some jurisdictions have declared they will not help ICE to serve federal warrants. There is some sentiment to step up the ICE deportation program.

The U.S. Bishops urge that family values be treasured and that families with minor U.S. citizens or a citizen spouse not be separated.

To date there has been precious little attention given to encouraging investment in Mexican (and other nations') businesses to create jobs at home for their unemployed. Similarly, largely ignored in the debate, was the contributing effect of current trade policies (e.g., NAFTA, that produced great benefits for U.S. business and precious little south of the border), and crop subsidies allowing U.S. corn and wheat to be sold in Mexico at prices undercutting the local market and creating huge unemployment for Mexican farm labor.

If you have thoughts on this, we encourage you to contact Sens. Feinstein and Boxer.

Walt Lundin, Parish Human Concerns Committee, July 2007


Status on Immigration Reform - Update
Piecemeal Efforts
Even before Congress failed in June to pass comprehensive immigration reform, state and local lawmakers were working on narrower measures. A news item (SF Chronicle, 8/5/07) said that 41 states have passed 171 laws (no details given) in the first half of 2007.
Congress itself is now proposing narrower measures. On August 2 four senators offered a bill to tighten border enforcement, require jail time for people who have overstayed their visas [there are estimates that 35%-40% of the 12 million illegals have expired visas], and to build detention centers on closed military bases. (Two senator co-sponsors had favored the June compehensive reform measure.)
Hazleton PA enacted a law with heavy penalties for landlords and businesses which rent to or hire illegal persons. A federal court judge ruled that that law violated due process rights and encroached into federal laws and policies. The city is appealing.
New Haven CT, in contrast, has a police policy to not question people about their immigration status. The city provides ID cards to residents. These give access to banks, libraries and some city services.
What "Comprehensive Immigration Reform" includes
The recommended policy of our U.S. bishops' conference combines: 1. Enhanced border protection, 2. Employer sanctions after a national data base is available to them, 3. A path to eventual legal status and 4. Preservation of family unity.
Deportation of Felons (ICE Raids)
Between 1997 and 2005 more than 672,000 people have been deported, court-ordered because convicted of felonies, both violent and non-violent. [In 2005 90,426 people were deported. Of these, 20.9% were violent, 64.6% were non-violent and 14.7% were for "other" crimes.] In many of these cases their citizen and green card family members, including children, have to choose between separating or remaining united in a poor country of origin. Immigrant advocates estimate 1.6 million people may be in this pickle.
Effect on Business
The June Senate defeat now threatens the supply of authorized seasonal workers. Agricultural interests ($30 billion income a year in California) and seafood suppliers in Maryland [surely there are others] have made the news recently. These industries compete against foreign producers and depend on cheap labor. Colorado and Idaho are looking to prison labor.
Day Worker Centers and Street Labor
A recent California study estimates that about 40,000 people are involved. They are about 3% of all the male undocumented work force and 0.2% of California's total work force. There are 24 cities with approved day worker centers, often offering a simple meal, job training, money management, ESL training, or some legal advice. On the flip side, 60 cities nationwide limit or prohibit street work solicitation.
The Mountain View worker center is desperately seeking a new site, because the host church needs the space. The San Jose center is flourishing.
Fees for Citizenship and Green Cards Going Up
Beginning this month the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services Agency raised the cost for processing the many legal requirements - some doubled or tripled. Zoe Lofgren, chairperson of a House immigration sub-committee wants to be sure the increases are justified. The Agency, funded only by fees, says it needs more money to modernize and to eliminate backlogs.

Walt Lundin, Parish Human Concerns Committee, August 2007


Cardinal Mahony Addresses Immigration Issues
“To the church, the immigration issue is primarily a humanitarian one, because it impacts on the well-being of millions of human beings. It has moral implications and must be viewed through a moral lens.” So said Cardinal Roger Mahony of Los Angeles on October 8, 2007, at an immigration forum at the University of Notre Dame. Cardinal Mahony said that an enforcement-only policy does not work. He noted that since 1993 the U.S. has spent $30 billion adding miles of barriers to the southern border, but the number of undocumented immigrants in the country has doubled in the same time period.

In his remarks, Cardinal Mahony asked why the Catholic Church would speak out on the issue of immigration. He said that it is because of the Gospel mandate, in which Jesus instructs us to “welcome the stranger” for what “you do to the least of my brothers, you do unto me” (Matt. 25:31 – 46). He said that it is also because the Catholic Church is itself an immigrant church that has grown with newcomers who have arrived on our shores.

He noted that the church is approached for legal, pastoral, social and emotional assistance on a daily basis. He said that sadly, we witness families being separated, migrant workers being exploited and families mourning the death of loved ones who die on their journey to the United States.

Giving his perspective of the church on the reality of immigration he said that it is clear that half of the earth’s inhabitants live in poverty and struggle to maintain their dignity, health and their very survival. In this hemisphere and other parts of the world, workers migrate to support their families. The overwhelming majority want to work, and they work hard and contribute to the American economy. They pay into the income, property and sales tax system and the Social Security system.

Cardinal Mahony stated that as many as 500,000 people enter the U.S. illegally each year and that 90 percent of them find work within six months. Despite these numbers, only 5000 low skilled visas are issued each year.

He said that instead of updating this outmoded system our nation has employed an enforcement-only approach, a system that has failed. This enforcement-only policy has led to greater misery resulting in over 3000 deaths in the desert since 1996. He said that our immigration policies are not consistent but contradictory. While we post a "no trespassing" sign at the border, we erect a "help wanted" sign at the workplace.

He went on to say that as comprehensive immigration policy has failed in Congress, we see enforcement raids that separate children from their parents and strike fear in immigration communities. We see state and local law enforcement targeting immigrants instead of pursuing real criminals.

By way of a solution, Cardinal Mahony favors a global solution.

First, we need to examine the root causes of migration and analyze how U.S. economic and trade policies impact economic flight. Second, we must comprehensively address and update the broken U.S. immigration system. Congress must act. The central feature of this effort should be to bring the 12 million undocumented immigrants out of the shadows and offer them legal status.

In return, these immigrants must learn English, pay a fine and work for several years before earning the right to receive permanent legal status. Also included in this package is a new visa worker program to allow more migrant workers to enter legally.

Cardinal Mahony went on to say that these immigrants would have to wait at the end of the line before becoming eligible for citizenship.

In conclusion, the Cardinal voiced his support for the Development, Relief and Education for Alien Minors Act (the DREAM act). This would permit young persons who are foreign-born, without legal status, and have lived in the U.S for five years, to adjust their status by completing two years of college or vocational training. These young persons would receive permanent legal status within six years, eventually leading to citizenship.

Terry McCaffrey, Parish Human Concerns Committee, December 2007. The source of the article is the October 25th 2007 edition of the Origins Magazine.


Church Teaching on Conscience

Church teaching on some issues is not in step with opinion polls. Sometimes it is a "minority report." What is to guide our thinking? [The following relies on Pars. 1779-1802, CCC.] The making of an informed conscience is a difficult and never-ending task. We must not make a moral decision lightly or carelessly. We should ponder, consult and pray earnestly. We must not be blinded by self-interest, by our passions or sins, by pre-judgment, by the peer pressure of popular opinion or by a calloused conscience. "Moral conscience, present at the heart of the person, enjoins him . . . to do good and to avoid evil. It also judges particular choices, approving those that are good." . . . "It is by the judgment of his conscience that man perceives and recognizes the prescriptions of the divine law . . ." ". . . In the formation of conscience the Word of God is the light for our path; we must assimilate it in faith and prayer and put it into practice." [CCC]


The Environment

"The Lord's are the earth and its fullness . . ." Ps. 24:1
"This land is your land, this land is my land . . . This land was made for you and me."
– Woody Guthrie (1956)

Can we have it both ways? Are the psalm and the rousing hootenanny favorite reconcilable?
From "The Catechism of the Catholic Church": #2415 - " . . . Use of the mineral, vegetable and animal resources of the universe cannot be divorced from respect for moral imperatives. Man's dominion over inanimate and other living beings granted by the Creator is not absolute; it is limited by concern for the quality of life of his neighbor, including GENERATIONS TO COME; [emphasis supplied] it requires a religious respect for the integrity of creation."
From "Faithful Citizenship": "The world that God created has been entrusted to us. Our use of it must be directed by God's plan for creation, not simply for our own benefit. Our stewardship of the earth is a form of participation in God's act of creating and sustaining the world. . . . We show our respect for the Creator by our care of creation."
These two paragraphs put responsibility on us - individuals, citizens of our country, citizens of Earth - to do as Mom used to say, "Leave something in the dish for the next person."
When it all began, God made it "and he found it very good." (Gen. l:31) . Leaping over the centuries to the 19th we find then a period of rapid population growth, technical progress, expanding markets, industrialism, colonialism seeking raw materials and markets, and wealth beyond dreams. Then it was not so "very good". What now of our 21st century?
Is it correct to say that we're putting a great strain on non-renewable resources? Is it fair to say that all this has dirtied up land, sea, air and the creatures of the deep? Are we giving sufficient thought and care for those who will follow us in the tomorrows to come?
To be sure, there are opposing views to a doomsday scenario. Some scientists and economists have concluded that all is not black, that we are making inroads on pollution and warming, that new technologies more widely used are making a difference, that a healthier global economy will stimulate more robust progress in turning things around, that there is still time. Maybe so. Let us hope. Speramus.
The thrust of all these fine words suggests this: Our property deed to "your land . . . my land" is not fee-simple, do-what-you-will-with-it, take-no-heed- for-tomorrow. We have only a conditional use permit calling for our prudence and restraint. But can we - or how can we - establish this as policy? We live now in a transnational corporation economy with global interconnections. Big guns, heavy hitters, bit in their teeth. To effect change, our nation and the international community must establish a consensus for a measured use of the earth's bounty and respect for the earth's fragility. That done, there must be an effective mechanism to apply policies that work for the common good, the good of all. In this effort our nation is the mightiest force that can bring this about. Take pen in hand and tell our representatives - again and again and again.
 

Back to Top